Ai
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:30 pm
Re: Ai
Thank you. I am surprised how easy it is. I had been focusing on story writing platforms and often been told I can't do that, so I had suspected that the chat bot would do so also and didn't even try it
- Viridian
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:03 am
Re: Ai
It's a bit of a dance with AI. You can get it to write very explicitly, but you have to really build up to the point where it will naturally do so rather. Think of it like foreplay. Chimerix described it will: you can't just say "write a sex scene", but if you organically include it as part of a building narrative, it normalises it and will start to go out on its own to describe things sexually.
A bit of advice is that you have to build the tone early. If the AI starts rejecting prompts, you can't really change its memorised behaviour. You can deflect it to focus on something else, and that might suit your purpose better (e.g. it might rejected sensual descriptions and advise that you go for something more psychological). Additionally, if it feels like it's breaking the rules you set, it will also pull out (e.g. you specify that you are writing an action thriller, so it will refrain from writing sensual scenes to maintain the genre's style - but if you start off by saying that you are going to include romance or an erotic tone, it will be more open).
A bit of advice is that you have to build the tone early. If the AI starts rejecting prompts, you can't really change its memorised behaviour. You can deflect it to focus on something else, and that might suit your purpose better (e.g. it might rejected sensual descriptions and advise that you go for something more psychological). Additionally, if it feels like it's breaking the rules you set, it will also pull out (e.g. you specify that you are writing an action thriller, so it will refrain from writing sensual scenes to maintain the genre's style - but if you start off by saying that you are going to include romance or an erotic tone, it will be more open).
Viridian @ deviantART: http://viridianqs.deviantart.com/
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:30 pm
Re: Ai
Took a day for some overseer to decide that telling a story about a nude woman siinking up to her chest and then escaping was too close to non consensual sex. Impressive while it lasted thoigh
- Chimerix
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Ai
quickbeard wrote:Took a day for some overseer to decide that telling a story about a nude woman siinking up to her chest and then escaping was too close to non consensual sex. Impressive while it lasted thoigh
Keep dancing around that edge. The more you do, the farther it extends. There will be limits, but they can be shifted well past where you initially encounter them.
The difference between theory and reality is that, in theory, there is no difference between theory and reality.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:30 pm
Re: Ai
Well I'm glad to know that I didn't break the system for everyone else I had asked for suggestions and she said something about emotions and how the heroine feels and I said any emotion except terror. I suspect that I set something off using that word.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:30 pm
Re: Ai
Says that forbidden things include
Focuses on fetish material with explicit erotic framing, especially when it's highly specific or repeated.
Focuses on fetish material with explicit erotic framing, especially when it's highly specific or repeated.
-
- Producer
- Posts: 17700
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:37 pm
- Location: Central Arkansas (At Studio 588)
- Contact:
Re: Ai
quickbeard wrote:Says that forbidden things include
Focuses on fetish material with explicit erotic framing, especially when it's highly specific or repeated.
I have a question that relates to this, indirectly. First, when you use AI to create a sequence, what is the best pixel resolution you can get? Second, is there anything displayed or embedded that restricts usage in any way?
If the answer to these is "at least basic 4K, and "No," then it would still be possible, and possibly desirable, to use some for of AI for part of a longer video and do the rest with real people. For example, you could start with AI to generate scenes of a 17th century pirte ship battling a storm and then wrecking, and then finish with live performers showing what happens to the surviving pirates.
Studio 588 currently offers more than 2200 different HD and QD quicksand videos and has supported production of well over 2400 video scenes and other projects by 20 different producers. Info may be found at:
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com
- Chimerix
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:44 am
- Contact:
Re: Ai
Fred588 wrote:I have a question that relates to this, indirectly. First, when you use AI to create a sequence, what is the best pixel resolution you can get? Second, is there anything displayed or embedded that restricts usage in any way?
There's nothing embedded that would restrict your usage.
You do have to pay attention to details. For example, the sample images I posted to your other thread contained spelling errors. Generative AI images are known for that, but it's a 5-minute fix in Photoshop.
Resolution tends to be tied to how much you're spending on your subscription.
The difference between theory and reality is that, in theory, there is no difference between theory and reality.
-
- Producer
- Posts: 17700
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:37 pm
- Location: Central Arkansas (At Studio 588)
- Contact:
Re: Ai
Chimerix wrote:Fred588 wrote:I have a question that relates to this, indirectly. First, when you use AI to create a sequence, what is the best pixel resolution you can get? Second, is there anything displayed or embedded that restricts usage in any way?
There's nothing embedded that would restrict your usage.
You do have to pay attention to details. For example, the sample images I posted to your other thread contained spelling errors. Generative AI images are known for that, but it's a 5-minute fix in Photoshop.
Resolution tends to be tied to how much you're spending on your subscription.
Thanks. Actually, I have no intention of trying to use AI at all, except possibly in collaboration, as hinted at.
Studio 588 currently offers more than 2200 different HD and QD quicksand videos and has supported production of well over 2400 video scenes and other projects by 20 different producers. Info may be found at:
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com
- Duncan Edwards
- Posts: 4867
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am
Re: Ai
Chimerix wrote:Fred588 wrote:I have a question that relates to this, indirectly. First, when you use AI to create a sequence, what is the best pixel resolution you can get? Second, is there anything displayed or embedded that restricts usage in any way?
There's nothing embedded that would restrict your usage.
You do have to pay attention to details. For example, the sample images I posted to your other thread contained spelling errors. Generative AI images are known for that, but it's a 5-minute fix in Photoshop.
Resolution tends to be tied to how much you're spending on your subscription.
I just wanted to add this since my most recent experiences reflect a lot of improvements. The latest models that I have been using provide a dramatic improvement in spelling details and on Runway I can render video at 4K. There's a subscription to pay for there, and Magespace, and Runway and Pika and Sora (yes, I'm addicted) but this stuff is getting very real at an easily accessible level. I really want to use Google's new Vo3 that's doing mind blowing work and adds voices and music to fit automatically but at $250.00 a month I'll wait a while yet. There's so much more in the pipeline.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.
Return to “General Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest