A question (Moved)

Sink Into On-Topic Discussions
bogmaiden
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:07 am

A question (Moved)

Postby bogmaiden » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:31 pm

Everyone:

I would like your opinion on the following matter: I love my bog maidens WITHOUT tattoos and WITHOUT belly button jewelry. What's the feeling out there? Agree or disagree? I'd love to know...

somebodyelse
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:10 am

Re: A question

Postby somebodyelse » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:37 am

Agree with bogmaiden

User avatar
Kinky Desires
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:55 pm
Location: Portsmouth, England, UK
Contact:

Re: A question

Postby Kinky Desires » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:58 am

I too am fine with belly button jewelry and turned off by facial piercings (I don't mind tongue piercings though - do they count as facial? lol)

With regard to tattoos; sometimes I like them, sometimes I don't! It depends on the size and/or quantity of tattoos. One or two Small ones are ok, for example I love Leila Hazlett's little central breast tattoo, but I'm turned off by very large and colourful tattoos such as those on Manchester (the Studio 588 model) and Cheryl Cole! The only large tattoo I can recall that I do like is on a bondage model called Sasha Fae, which is a black and white tribal design going all the way around her waistline and into her (ahem) private area!

Mike Nomic
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:00 am

Re: A question

Postby Mike Nomic » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:48 pm

Agree wholeheartedly with Bogmaiden.

Mr Mudster
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:21 pm

Re: A question

Postby Mr Mudster » Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:34 pm

Same here. Tats and piercings are a big turnoff to me.

QuicksandMania
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: A question

Postby QuicksandMania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:10 pm

As unspoiled as the driven snow, please ...

User avatar
DaegonNeo
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:46 am

Re: A question

Postby DaegonNeo » Fri Sep 19, 2014 1:18 am

This seems to be an interesting trend.

wosname_78 wrote:I too am fine with belly button jewelry and turned off by facial piercings (I don't mind tongue piercings though - do they count as facial? lol)

With regard to tattoos; sometimes I like them, sometimes I don't! It depends on the size and/or quantity of tattoos. One or two Small ones are ok, for example I love Leila Hazlett's little central breast tattoo, but I'm turned off by very large and colourful tattoos such as those on Manchester (the Studio 588 model) and Cheryl Cole! The only large tattoo I can recall that I do like is on a bondage model called Sasha Fae, which is a black and white tribal design going all the way around her waistline and into her (ahem) private area!


I have to agree with this assessment. I do enjoy small tattoos in moderation, and ethnic tattoos are always interesting, but gaudy, overly-colorful and detailed arm tattoos seem to distract from the important parts, in my humble opinion...
"By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher."

"Tolerance is the last refuge of a scoundrel."
-Socrates

User avatar
Beast260
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:36 am
Location: Melb, Australia
Contact:

Re: A question

Postby Beast260 » Fri Sep 19, 2014 2:38 am

I dont really care. all i care about is how well they can pull off the Damsel sinking in quicksand and how thick the mud is.

sure some face piecing's can be over the top but in the end, its how they wish to look and its how they wish to be.

User avatar
schlamm
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:01 am
Location: Desert realm

Re: A question

Postby schlamm » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:21 am

I think it is an indication of the available wealth of material now as opposed to 15 years ago.... back then ANYONE actually photographed in mud, let alone sinking or stuck, was a rarity.
Now we can nit-pick hair color, style, attire, tattoos, etc...and no, this isn't intended to be a slam of Bogmaiden, just a reminder of how far things have progressed in a relatively short period of time 8-)

User avatar
wysvp
Producer
Posts: 895
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:38 pm
Location: Boston, MA, USA

Re: A question

Postby wysvp » Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:20 am

I believe this thread will soon be moved to the General Discussion forum, given the nature of the discussion. However, since it was posted to my forum first, and I do shoot with a lot of tattooed models, let me reply:

I like all women in mud and quicksand - tall, thin, curvy, Rubenesque, without tattoos, with tattoos, long hair, short hair, etc., etc. I happen to know a number of models with lots of tattoos - they expressed interest in sinking in quicksand, so, voila - I shoot them in mud/quicksand.

For me, it is their acting ability, their sense of adventure, and their creativity with scenes. For instance, you will soon see a very hot and dramatic scene with Dinah Deville, one of my most tattooed covered and pierced models. Watching her sink that day - I can tell you I never noticed her tattoos and piercings!

Luckily for us all, there is a special "type" of woman out there to make our sinkings and fantasies quite diverse. :)

Mike
Mike
Damsels in Distress Visual Productions
http://www.didvp.com
photo@didvp.com


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests