Quicksand Fans

Everyone:

I would like your opinion on the following matter: I love my bog maidens WITHOUT tattoos and WITHOUT belly button jewelry. What's the feeling out there? Agree or disagree? I'd love to know...

Agree with bogmaiden

I too am fine with belly button jewelry and turned off by facial piercings (I don't mind tongue piercings though - do they count as facial? lol)

With regard to tattoos; sometimes I like them, sometimes I don't! It depends on the size and/or quantity of tattoos. One or two Small ones are ok, for example I love Leila Hazlett's little central breast tattoo, but I'm turned off by very large and colourful tattoos such as those on Manchester (the Studio 588 model) and Cheryl Cole! The only large tattoo I can recall that I do like is on a bondage model called Sasha Fae, which is a black and white tribal design going all the way around her waistline and into her (ahem) private area!

Agree wholeheartedly with Bogmaiden.

Same here. Tats and piercings are a big turnoff to me.

As unspoiled as the driven snow, please ...

This seems to be an interesting trend.

wosname_78 wrote:I too am fine with belly button jewelry and turned off by facial piercings (I don't mind tongue piercings though - do they count as facial? lol)

With regard to tattoos; sometimes I like them, sometimes I don't! It depends on the size and/or quantity of tattoos. One or two Small ones are ok, for example I love Leila Hazlett's little central breast tattoo, but I'm turned off by very large and colourful tattoos such as those on Manchester (the Studio 588 model) and Cheryl Cole! The only large tattoo I can recall that I do like is on a bondage model called Sasha Fae, which is a black and white tribal design going all the way around her waistline and into her (ahem) private area!

I have to agree with this assessment. I do enjoy small tattoos in moderation, and ethnic tattoos are always interesting, but gaudy, overly-colorful and detailed arm tattoos seem to distract from the important parts, in my humble opinion...

I dont really care. all i care about is how well they can pull off the Damsel sinking in quicksand and how thick the mud is.

sure some face piecing's can be over the top but in the end, its how they wish to look and its how they wish to be.

I think it is an indication of the available wealth of material now as opposed to 15 years ago.... back then ANYONE actually photographed in mud, let alone sinking or stuck, was a rarity.
Now we can nit-pick hair color, style, attire, tattoos, etc...and no, this isn't intended to be a slam of Bogmaiden, just a reminder of how far things have progressed in a relatively short period of time

I believe this thread will soon be moved to the General Discussion forum, given the nature of the discussion. However, since it was posted to my forum first, and I do shoot with a lot of tattooed models, let me reply:

I like all women in mud and quicksand - tall, thin, curvy, Rubenesque, without tattoos, with tattoos, long hair, short hair, etc., etc. I happen to know a number of models with lots of tattoos - they expressed interest in sinking in quicksand, so, voila - I shoot them in mud/quicksand.

For me, it is their acting ability, their sense of adventure, and their creativity with scenes. For instance, you will soon see a very hot and dramatic scene with Dinah Deville, one of my most tattooed covered and pierced models. Watching her sink that day - I can tell you I never noticed her tattoos and piercings!

Luckily for us all, there is a special "type" of woman out there to make our sinkings and fantasies quite diverse.

Mike