30%? That sounds so wrong. I can rest that myth that we lost a third of our trees. Not a chance.
This is more accurate... and more believable:
"From 2000 to 2020, California experienced a net change of -466kha (-3.4%) change in tree cover."Dunno how three and a half percent became thirty percent, but odd things happening in the media and elsewhere these days. My data came from here:
https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashb ... owMap=trueI did see data that California lost 30%-40% of the total trees lost IN THE USA (not total in California alone) in the year 2020, but that's when we had a lot of massive fires and that only accounts for one year. That's not the norm. We had nothing like that the following 2 years, and fire season is over for 2022.
The news makes it sound sometimes like half of the state is in flames even though these big fires really only cover the tiniest of plots in a huge state.
We still have lots of trees! Just forget desert clime southern California where the grass fires and mudslides are and go north where the forests and the biggest trees in the world are found. Northern Cal gets 10 inches of rain for every inch San Francisco in MID California see's each year, hence heavily forested. We just need the rain back to feed it all!
https://www.google.com/search?q=califor ... 1&dpr=1.25