Quicksand Fans

When watching a scene, do you prefer a quick sink or a slow struggle?
Also do you prefer submergence of the victim or for them to escape/be rescued/erotic reaction to the scene?

Its part curious thinking but it willhelp me work out how I write some more of my quicksand stories:)

I've mainly been into the slow sink genre, but I like a combination of erotic and submergence and rescue. Like maybe grabbing hold of a rope with her flailing arms after she submerges, and is rescued just before drowning.

Yes.

I like the "Slow Sinks" as well. Seeing high heels creating a depression in the mud that gets deeper and then seeing a the womans legs pumping in and out of quicksand is so hot to me. The man made quicksand pits that had water flowing upwards causing the model to sink was inspiring as well.

No matter who produces the videos or the pix; Thank you for what you do. Quick or slow; the girls are still sinking "in quicksand" so I am happy with that!

I enjoy the idea of a melodramatic scene featuring a gal in a very slow, leggy, struggle-intensive sink in deep, thick mud. I like the storyline where the gal gets stuck feet first then struggles and strains, slowly inching her way deeper into the mire where her arms become stuck and she eventually vanishes into the ooze.

Thank you for asking!

Duncan Edwards wrote:Yes.

I agree!

bbjohn wrote:

Duncan Edwards wrote:Yes.

I agree!

Ditto!

I like slow sinking, a little struggle, but not too much when she's up to her thighs.

Slow, definitely slow. It's all about the panic for me.

In theory I'd like submersions, but I find a lot of submersion scenes are too watery. No fault to the directors I imagine it's near impossible to do.

Adamantly, both. It depends on the particular scene/idea/mood - that is critical enough to me to affect which I prefer. In general, a small favoring of one in the ratio of types of scenes would not trouble me, though I firmly believe both should be represented.