Billie Bonce wrote:A small remark about Stalingrad. I am always totally puzzled why Western (especially American) people always mention Stalingrad only. It was one of the major battles of the WWII, I agree, but only one of. Not the first victory over Germans, and not the most lethal. (The initial offensive of the Germans in 1941 was - and I hope will remain forever - the most lethal battle in human history.) You'd say, it was the pivot point. Yes, again, one of. The battle of Moscow in December 1941 was more critical, and the victory was... I'd say, more surprising. I don't know how they managed to stop the Germans in less than 40 km (25 miles) from Kremlin. Yes, the Germans were exhausted to that moment, but they were in 25 miles from Kremlin. They were in Khimki - it is closer to the center than any of today's Moscow airports.
And it was as close as they ever would get to the capital.
Not to downplay the incredible contributions and sacrifices of all nations who took part in the Second World War - or Great Patriotic War to our Russian friends - but the war against fascism in Europe would have been a lot more difficult and costly if not for the pounding the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe took in Eastern Europe, and the horribly high cost paid by the Soviet armed forces and civilians caught up in that meat grinder. Consider just the high cost of fighting in Normandy. Now imagine what it would have been like if the bulk of Hitler's divisions weren't being chewed up in the east, but were instead being used to repulse the invasion of France. Scary thought, even with the Allied air superiority.
If I recall correctly, Germany was on the retreat as of 1943 following actions such as the Battle of Kursk... After Stalingrad, the Germans launched another counteroffensive in the summer which was stopped, then rolled back by the Red Army.