The Need For Speed

No political or religious topics please. Otherwise, anything goes, as long as we treat each other with respect.
User avatar
nachtjaeger
Posts: 2373
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:45 am
Location: upstate NY USA
Contact:

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby nachtjaeger » Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:20 am

Sweet! But, as long as nobody objects, I plan to avoid looking "up" through the canopy and seeing terrain. :shock:

kham wrote:French AF Playing

Some good delta-wing stuff here :)
This space for rent- advertise your product or service here!

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby kham » Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:37 am

Yeah, neggies suck :P but some good drivers there :)

User avatar
DangerGirl
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:50 am

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby DangerGirl » Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:36 pm

schlamm wrote:I believe what we are witnessing in that video is an aborted approach....as to why he jammed the throttles and yanked the nose up I suspect a 'fouled deck' or something in the danger area immediately adjacent to the angle deck. The hook came DAMN close to snagging the number two wire which would have brought that flight to a very abrupt end had it done so. I spent a few years working on the deck myself on now retired ships so there is a bit of experience behind that opinion ;)


Luckily for that pilot, the Su-33 has enough thrust and low-speed, high-AOA controllability enter, sustain, and escape from a "Sabre Dance" situation. And I agree; had that hook actually caught cable, it would have been ugly.

Not a lot of people know that Fairchild Republic built a prototype naval version of the A-10, with a backward-facing tailhook. Unfortunately, while certainly fast enough, the carriers lacked the maneuverability to consistently trap the Warthog from behind.

User avatar
DangerGirl
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:50 am

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby DangerGirl » Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:45 am

Looks like China is getting into the 5th-generation fighter act. Hard to say right now how good it's actually going to be, though.

User avatar
Mynock
Posts: 2898
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 pm
Location: PA

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby Mynock » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:51 am

Modernizing their military=steal an F-22 and paint a red star on the tail. :lol:
"Know thyself, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories."
--Sun Tzu

User avatar
Billie Bonce
Posts: 1028
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Obscured by clouds
Contact:

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby Billie Bonce » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:23 am

DangerGirl wrote:Hard to say right now how good it's actually going to be, though.
It doesn't matter. They have maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany pilots
There’s so many different worlds
So many different suns
And we have just one world
But we live in different ones

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4208
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby Duncan Edwards » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:30 am

DangerGirl wrote:... while certainly fast enough, the carriers lacked the maneuverability to consistently trap the Warthog from behind.


I used to hear dad say something similar about A-1 Skyraiders back in the day. 8-)
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby kham » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:54 am

Kinda reminds me of the YF-23, or if the -23 and an F-22 got together and this was the outcome.

Whether or not it does anything than look good at an airshow, is an open question however....

bart1997
Posts: 729
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 2:54 pm

.

Postby bart1997 » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:26 am

.
Last edited by bart1997 on Fri May 08, 2015 11:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DangerGirl
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:50 am

Re: The Need For Speed

Postby DangerGirl » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:53 pm

bart1997 wrote:Alas, from the economic point of view it's the american and the european taxpayer (to a lesser extent) who pays all that equipment, as they have billions and billions of bonds in North America and the EU already. You can think good, neutral or bad about them, but they know how to play that new "Great Game"

Sun Tzu would be pleased.


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests