fightingfish wrote:@Lomax
well, I only know this single scene and not the whole movie and it was not my intention to glorify war. I only tried to see the situation in Kobane with the eyes of the Kurds who are desperate and who know that if ISIS succeed in conquering their citiy they all will get murdered even their kids and old people and then as all hope seems to be lost, the US Airforce suddenly shows up to the scene and stops the terrorists! And in my opinion this movie scene illustrates this perfectly.
Well yes, indeed. But ISIS are the people who, a year or so ago, the West seriously considered arming to help them in their struggle against President Assad - the chap who was using chemical weapons on them. Now, Bashar al-Assad is undoubtedly a nasty piece of work, who in a perfect world should be locked in a small oubliette underneath Krak des Chevaliers. But we don't live in a perfect world; and now we might have to help Assad deal with ISIS.
Much like Saddam Hussein - another nasty piece of work who was free with the chemicals. So he was overthrown; and a US/UK/etc occupation force spent ten years pacifying/rebuilding/enlightening the country. And how stable is Iraq now?
No, I don't pretend that I know any of the answers - and I accept that Pragmatism and Realpolitik outrank Idealism and wild dreams of Utopia. But the failure of all sorts of governments to think things through; and the tendency for actions carried out with the best of intentions to have unforeseen and distressing consequences... Will the US still be bombing in a year? Two years? Ten years?