Page 1 of 2

AC 624

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:26 pm
by kham
And another one down....

Global News

They for some reason pushing this as a "hard landing"
:roll:

No
A hard landing is where you scuff the fuse or blow tires

OK
If you land 1100 feet short, smash THROUGH the approach lights, go UPHILL, leave your entire landing gear behind, and one engine, and half the stab, and bits of both wings……. and have to get off on an escape slide… Thats a Fucking Crash

Re: AC 624

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:43 pm
by Mynock
Reminds me of that Ron White joke.....
"Hit somethin' hard, I don't want to limp away from this piece of shit!" :lol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRJpRu2RsSs

Re: AC 624

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 10:09 pm
by DangerGirl
Took out a power line and the localizer antenna for the opposite runway. Yeah, that was no landing.

Re: AC 624

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:34 pm
by kham
Its as if some progspeak retard did their press release...

Yeah
Sure
This'll buff right out
:shock:

Hull Loss
The fucking thing might not even be good for parts

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am
by nachtjaeger
The old rule is "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one." I guess this is the exception to the rule. Yet another Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot moment for commercial aviation.

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:25 am
by DangerGirl
nachtjaeger wrote:The old rule is "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one." I guess this is the exception to the rule. Yet another Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot moment for commercial aviation.

The corollary to that adage is "Unless you're financially liable for the airplane and the stuff you crashed into."

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:12 am
by kham
nachtjaeger wrote:The old rule is "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one." I guess this is the exception to the rule. Yet another Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot moment for commercial aviation.


It would be nice to be able to use the airplane again too, not have it bulldozed off the runway

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:04 pm
by Mynock
Is it really common practice to repair crashed planes? That concept is kind of frightening. It's one thing if you pop a tire or suck a bird into an engine but that thing is pretty screwed up.

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:21 pm
by kham
No, I'd say this Bus is trashed; the impact forces probably even killed all the instruments and electronics on the flight deck. A wrecker might be able to part some things out, like components, seats, stuff from the galleys and lavs, etc.

But repairing some things are done, like tail strikes. As long as the proper procedures followed, everything is fine. That is what happened with the JAL 747 over Mt Fuji years back, they had repaired a tail strike which damaged the rear pressure bulkhead improperly, and it was just a matter of mathematics as to the number of cycles before it failed. Took the back part of tail, rudder, and most of the stab with it. Not good

Re: AC 624

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:06 pm
by DangerGirl
Kham is correct. This airplane's career is over. It might have a future as a firefighter training hulk or an exhibit at the Museum of What Not to Do.