Why, good sir! It took you quite a while to answer my post. I thought it was forgotten completely.
Sandy Pointe wrote:I'm glad we agree Mark Knopfler has a talent for expressing complex thoughts in a highly-emotive manner.
I'm sorry we disagree on giving an author credit for his or her work.
No, you're twisting things. We disagree on necessity of explicitly indicate who's the author of the words that are quoted
in a forum signature.
Sandy Pointe wrote:I believe I noted you are located in one of the former eastern bloc countries (you have my sympathies) where corruption and deception are viewed in a different light than here in the US. Please note I did not say better; we have plenty of it to go around.
Yes, I live i Ukraine (it's a former republic of the USSR) and I'm quite happy with that. We do have a lot of problems, they are very different from your problems, and I don't think I would like to change our problems for yours.
You are right about the corruption, it is one of the greatest problems here. I don't think it's "viewed in a different light". It's just exists.
Sandy Pointe wrote:But allow me to point out that in the west, presenting someone else's work as your own (in other words, unattributed) is the definition of the word plagiarism, which is a fancy way of saying "liar". Right or wrong, like it or not, that is how it is viewed in US culture.
Don't take the mentor's tone. The definition of the plagiarism is absolutely the same here. But again: quoting lyrics of a well-known song doesn't mean "presenting someone else's work as your own".
And please, don't make references to US culture.
Sandy Pointe wrote:Consider it another way; you compose a story about qs and post it somewhere.
Would you be pleased to see someone else posting it on the QSF website without any indication it was written by you?
As I said above, you incorrectly substitute things. Quoting is one thing, posting the whole is another one. I do would be pleased if someone would quote a phrase from my story, even without any attributing. "Wow", would I think, "I became a classic!"
Well, I do understand your point of view. But I believe it's your own point of view and it doesn't represent the opinion of the most of members of the forum. There are some evidence for thinking this way:
1. Currently you are the only one member of the forum who insist that I did something wrong. Some others support me, most just don't care.
2. Following your logic, all the members of the forum should indicate the authors of the words that are quoted in their signatures, as well as the origin of their avatars. Including phrases like "to be or not to be?" or "in vino veritas". As I can see, this is not the case. Somebody may discuss their avatars or signatures somewhere in this forum, others may not.
3. I didn't receive any complaints from the moderators of the forum.
Yours sincerely,
Billie