Some more old TOS fun

No political or religious topics please. Otherwise, anything goes, as long as we treat each other with respect.
User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Some more old TOS fun

Postby kham » Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:42 pm

Yeah, the plot wasn't best, and the uniforms sucked balls, but we at least had a movie :)

ST-TMP orbital dock tour

3:11 hello old friend :)

5:04 ENTERPRISE! :twisted: I remember the audience all cheering at this point, who cared about the rest, the Big-E was back!

6:50 Such a nice little touch, the font on Enterprise's fantail is the correct one, taken from the REAL Enterprise CV-6

7:15 Docking, and the colours of the United Federation of Planets, when they didn't take shit from ANYONE :twisted:

User avatar
Qsvgitguy
Always Remembered
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:09 am
Contact:

Re: Some more old TOS fun

Postby Qsvgitguy » Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:10 am

Yeah! Definitely not the best Trek movie, but I really enjoy it just the same! Especially the director's cut! They did a great job on that, so much so that I can't watch the theatrical version any more.

And you know that, just like Babylon 5, if Dr. Sheldon Cooper doesn't like it, it MUST BE GOOD! :lol:

QuicksandMania
Posts: 545
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: Some more old TOS fun

Postby QuicksandMania » Sun Oct 27, 2013 6:45 am

Star Trek Movie Memories by William Shatner is worth reading. The accounting behind the first movie included the sunk costs behind the abandoned effort at a television series called Star Trek: Phase II aimed at resurrecting the franchise on the small screen. This contributed to the movie's whopping reported total production cost of $42 million.

I always enjoyed this "Enterprise exterior inspection" scene and especially the music. I concede that it was far too padded to qualify as a legitimate advancement of the plot or the character development. It mainly served as pure emotional juice for fans who finally got to see their favorite piece of hardware on the silver screen.

Leonard Nimoy spoke at my university back in the late 1980s about the first four films. He said the studio executives played a large role in the first movie devolving into a "bland, sterile" piece of work. I saw many nodding heads of old fans in the audience agreeing with him.

I personally enjoyed the first film when I was a boy and saw it several times in the theaters and on television. I can understand why critics take it to task. It had the potential to be much better. Per this article the director himself admitted the final edit amounted to a mediocre rush job. I was glad he had a chance to deliver a director's cut to DVD before he died.


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests