Thoughts on my preferences...

Making Fakes? Post Them Here!

What is your desired preference in lovers?

Poll ended at Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:57 pm

1. Natural (as they are, no manipulation)
11
39%
2. Enhanced (manipulation is okay, but it needs to be DAMN good work)
2
7%
A. petite, svelte, lithe, pixy, twigy...
4
14%
B. not small but not exceptional, so called "average"...
3
11%
C. Athletic, tone, healthy, above average...
4
14%
D. Exceptional, rare, having a body like this takes a disciplined diet, exercise and special genes...
2
7%
E. Outrageous, freakish genetics, seeming impossible, likely unnatural, absolutely unique...
1
4%
F. Non-conformist, you like what most others scoff. such as extremely unhealthy and/or not human(either waifishly starving "the concentration camp look", to "Eats other people whole" morbidly obese, Jabba the Hutt, donkeys, oysters, trees with knot holes, giant spiders, furry/yiff/yapp animal-human hybrids, reptilian aliens, popes, vampires that do sparkle, vampires that don't, etc...
1
4%
 
Total votes: 28

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:39 pm

The following images have not been manipulated AT ALL. In my opinion, these *Are, but not quite are* quicksand images.
Where I to manipulate these, the ladies would have increased curves and be at various depths...

but, I am being told by some that my "enhancements" are actually ruining the images. I would like to know your opinions:
Mine is thus, "I would not kick a petite woman Say a mature Ariel or tinkerbell out of my hammock, but I would prefer Jessica Rabbit".

The "IS, but alas, is not" quicksand images follow after this post.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by noone on Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:41 pm

the could be, images...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:15 pm

more...

I won't post anything more graphic than these. that is my own pref.
In real life I would have considered myself lucky to have had known one of these ladies as a friend...
conversely, these are akin to the ladies who used the word "love" like I do oxygen -
all the while spurning my efforts to spend time with them.

That was over a decade ago, before I met My wife. That was then.
I have had women use me, abuse me, play games with me, and didn't really get a chance to develop any relationships since I was seventeen.

at the age of 35, I had grown bitter and resentful. I stopped trying to get attention, at all.
All I wanted was the truth. That was when, [u]She chose me.[/u]
that is what it took for me to find my wife.

I still long for adventure, and eroticism - But I am absolutely bound to the affection we have built together.
In my youth I have has the following misadventures:
I was blackmailed for my inheritance by a false accusation of rape before I graduated High school at the age of 17.
I had sex in quicksand in Italy at the age of 18.
I had a random romantic encounter in Sheffield at the age of 18.
I encountered Liv Tyler in a mall at the age of 21.
I had two Japanese sisters experiment with me at the age of 23.
I had a relationship with a playboy playmate at the age of 25.
I ran into a tanning lotion calendar shoot and was molested by all the young women there at the age of 25.
I have made love to a nun when I was 27
I made love to a woman who was my boss at the age of 30
and later on, was seduced by her college attending daughter at the age of 31.
These few "misadventures" a separated by spans of years from 17 to 35.
Technically, I have had one of these nine such "Misadventures" every two-three years.

Yet none of these "misadventures" were relationships, and all of those years were very much empty,
despite being surrounded by women who were seeking their own intimate relationships.

Very much so, my fascinations and preferences in women have been shaped by these misadventures.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:24 pm

what are your preferences?
plain, endowed, or "Holy (Bleep)" ENDOWED? Normal, exceptional, Unique/freakish...
Manipulations of the curves? yae or nae.
Quicksand manipulations? Yae or Nae.

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:26 pm

I must point out - That in my preferences. I do not like women who appear to be plastic. if you are a walking surgery brochure... I'm not interested.

If you are the real deal - and yes, there are REAL women out there who are positively endowed to the point of almost being absurd...
I can hardly control myself.

User avatar
MadMax359
Posts: 5125
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:07 pm
Location: north carolina

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby MadMax359 » Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:49 pm

noone wrote:The following images have not been manipulated AT ALL. In my opinion, these *Are, but not quite are* quicksand images.
Where I to manipulate these, the ladies would have increased curves and be at various depths...

but, I am being told by some that my "enhancements" are actually ruining the images. I would like to know your opinions:
Mine is thus, "I would not kick a petite woman Say a mature Ariel or tinkerbell out of my hammock, but I would prefer Jessica Rabbit".

The "IS, but alas, is not" quicksand images follow.


my favorite is the first Jessica, the second is a bit too buxom to be possible :twisted:
The strong do what they want, the weak do what they must

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:31 pm

MadMax359 wrote:my favorite is the first Jessica, the second is a bit too buxom to be possible :twisted:


Okay, so we have a vote for uhm, "Very, but not too much".
I have other questions: Should the curves be manipulated, or does that ruin the picture for you?
maybe I need to start a poll or two.

noone
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 5:38 am

Re: Thoughts on my preferences...

Postby noone » Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:42 am

Thus Far the tally appears to be one of:
A. The model must be left untouched, not manipulated.
B. the subject can be anyone, sexiness is a plus, but the real interest is in the Quicksand Peril.


Return to “Manipulations”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests