Quicksand Fans

When I see kids here, I make them go away.

Moderator wrote:When I see kids here, I make them go away.

What is the age limit for "kids"? 16 or 18 or 21? Do cartoon animated video clips of "kids" count, too? Just wondering if the Camp Candy scene counted as "kids".

It apparently did, as the original posting on here I made is now gone. I understand that this is a fetish community, but also, are we not as a community trying to preserve each type of scene dealing with quicksand, or any type of "sinking" scene? I do believe that is what Dave and Crypto were doing in the very beginnings, were they not? If I am wrong, please forgive me. However, the Camp Candy cartoon did feature an adult sinking as well, cartoon or not, so it can be placed on here for the fact that an animated John Candy sunk in a lake of gelatin, so there is that well.

qsgroupie wrote:It apparently did, as the original posting on here I made is now gone. I understand that this is a fetish community, but also, are we not as a community trying to preserve each type of scene dealing with quicksand, or any type of "sinking" scene? I do believe that is what Dave and Crypto were doing in the very beginnings, were they not? If I am wrong, please forgive me. However, the Camp Candy cartoon did feature an adult sinking as well, cartoon or not, so it can be placed on here for the fact that an animated John Candy sunk in a lake of gelatin, so there is that well.

Check out Rule #2 here - viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29 It's as unambiguous as possible. And that makes a zero tolerance stance both reasonable and possible.

However, the Camp Candy cartoon did feature an adult sinking as well

So, if you have sex with a fourteen year old, it's not statutory rape if you bang the mom as well? Ok, that's pretty snarky. And we're not thought police either ("You were looking at the kids, weren't you!"). But the point is that we can not have this kind of exposure. There's tons of stuff here. And there are other venues that don't have/require a rule like this. It is what it is.

are we not as a community trying to preserve each type of scene dealing with quicksand, or any type of "sinking" scene?

No. We are a community that is here to discuss (and share) scenes/topics dealing with quicksand - from an adult point of view.

But archiving is important also. That's why I created quicksandmovies.net. And to tell a family secret, I have yet to decide about underage content there. The site itself is ok, but it is clearly sponsored by an 'adult' entity.

qsgroupie wrote:It apparently did, as the original posting on here I made is now gone. I understand that this is a fetish community, but also, are we not as a community trying to preserve each type of scene dealing with quicksand, or any type of "sinking" scene? I do believe that is what Dave and Crypto were doing in the very beginnings, were they not? If I am wrong, please forgive me. However, the Camp Candy cartoon did feature an adult sinking as well, cartoon or not, so it can be placed on here for the fact that an animated John Candy sunk in a lake of gelatin, so there is that well.

That is not specifically a goal for this community. All pretenses aside, this is a fetish community. Yes, the quicksand element itself might be the thing that sparks many people in the community, but we do not want ANYTHING to do with minors on this forum. You don't get to combine children with a forum that also posts explicit content.

Crypto made the list to catalogue scenes, but he was not a founding member of QSF and QSF was not intended to "preserve each type of scene dealing with quicksand". As it says at the top, this is the "home for quicksand fetishism".

Think of it has having teenage make-out scenes or kids holding hands from the Disney Channel on a regular porn site. I like kids. Used to be one myself. But this is where the adults hang out and I like it that way.

dlodoski wrote:Check out Rule #2 here - viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29 It's as unambiguous as possible.

un·am·big·u·ous
/ˌənamˈbiɡyo͞oəs/
adjective
not open to more than one interpretation.
"instructions should be unambiguous"

Totally agree. That is why I omit to mention such cases in the Hispanic market.