A few Erotic Pokemon requests

[bizzare guy]

Removed by Bizzare guy, sorry to cause problems.
Feel free to lock this topic, as it now has no point.

[Aiko]

I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.

[bizzare guy]

I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.

Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...

[benmetal]

I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.

Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...

I vaguely remember seeing the movie from which the character in question appears. I recall the character in question actually being a legendary (and therefore, very old) Pokemon in disguise in human form. Looked it up:

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Bianca

Turns out Latias (the aforementioned legendary Pokemon) disguises itself as the previously posted character, Bianca. The way they are differentiated is that the human character wears a white beret, as seen in the image, whereas the Pokemon-in-disguise looks the same, but without the beret. So, technically, would the Pokemon-in-disguise character (as in, the girl minus the hat) be allowed? Fighting technicalities with technicalities here.

[bizzare guy]

I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.

Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...

I vaguely remember seeing the movie from which the character in question appears. I recall the character in question actually being a legendary (and therefore, very old) Pokemon in disguise in human form. Looked it up:

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Bianca

Turns out Latias (the aforementioned legendary Pokemon) disguises itself as the previously posted character, Bianca. The way they are differentiated is that the human character wears a white beret, as seen in the image, whereas the Pokemon-in-disguise looks the same, but without the beret. So, technically, would the Pokemon-in-disguise character (as in, the girl minus the hat) be allowed? Fighting technicalities with technicalities here.

That's true, I didn't think of that...
Thanks for sticking up for me.

[General Woundwort]

Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.

[bizzare guy]

Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.

Ok, I'll take it down, then.
Sorry to cause trouble, it won't happen again.

[General Woundwort]

Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.

Ok, I'll take it down, then.
Sorry to cause trouble, it won't happen again.

This is a touchy area for obvious reasons; this particular thread has been nothing but civil, though I shall agree with your suggestion that the topic be locked.