Removed by Bizzare guy, sorry to cause problems.
Feel free to lock this topic, as it now has no point.
A few Erotic Pokemon requests
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 pm
A few Erotic Pokemon requests
Last edited by bizzare guy on Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Aiko
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:43 pm
- Location: The Great Swamp
- Contact:
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.
Visit me at the Great Swamp, but watch your step on the way there!
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
Aiko wrote:I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.
Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:59 am
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
bizzare guy wrote:Aiko wrote:I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.
Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...
I vaguely remember seeing the movie from which the character in question appears. I recall the character in question actually being a legendary (and therefore, very old) Pokemon in disguise in human form. Looked it up:
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Bianca
Turns out Latias (the aforementioned legendary Pokemon) disguises itself as the previously posted character, Bianca. The way they are differentiated is that the human character wears a white beret, as seen in the image, whereas the Pokemon-in-disguise looks the same, but without the beret. So, technically, would the Pokemon-in-disguise character (as in, the girl minus the hat) be allowed? Fighting technicalities with technicalities here.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
benmetal wrote:bizzare guy wrote:Aiko wrote:I am by no means an expert on Pokemon characters, but based on that picture alone I highly doubt she is gonna pass the age requirements of this site.
Oh, my apologies, I wasn't aware of this...
Thank you for telling me.
If it's not allowed, I'm sorry to have made this problem...
I vaguely remember seeing the movie from which the character in question appears. I recall the character in question actually being a legendary (and therefore, very old) Pokemon in disguise in human form. Looked it up:
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Bianca
Turns out Latias (the aforementioned legendary Pokemon) disguises itself as the previously posted character, Bianca. The way they are differentiated is that the human character wears a white beret, as seen in the image, whereas the Pokemon-in-disguise looks the same, but without the beret. So, technically, would the Pokemon-in-disguise character (as in, the girl minus the hat) be allowed? Fighting technicalities with technicalities here.
That's true, I didn't think of that...
Thanks for sticking up for me.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:45 pm
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
General Woundwort wrote:Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.
Ok, I'll take it down, then.
Sorry to cause trouble, it won't happen again.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:45 pm
Re: A few Erotic Pokemon requests
bizzare guy wrote:General Woundwort wrote:Please keep rule number 2 in mind - 2. No content (or linking to content) that discusses or depicts underaged persons or characters is allowed. This is an adult site. - regardless of hat or other wardrobe item. Thank you.
Ok, I'll take it down, then.
Sorry to cause trouble, it won't happen again.
This is a touchy area for obvious reasons; this particular thread has been nothing but civil, though I shall agree with your suggestion that the topic be locked.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests