Quicksand Fans

DeepSink wrote:My vote is nude, deep, and slow. And throw in some inverted stuff! And I, also, am a guy. I don't happen to be gay (at least, I don't THINK so), but I get a great deal of vicarious enjoyment from images of guys sinking; reminds me of what I've done and what I would LIKE to be doing. Too cold now, though, in the Pacific Northwest of USA. -DeepSink

Thanks for responding. I'm not gay either but it is fun to watch guys sink, I'm more into the nude sinking, slowly full submersion.

steve84 wrote:

DeepSink wrote:My vote is nude, deep, and slow.

I have NEVER seen a photo collection, or video documenting such a male sink! I'd sure as hell love to though!

Well, you WILL after the weather warms up (July-August) IF I can find someone to operate a video camera for me!

DeepSink wrote:IF I can find someone to operate a video camera for me!

I would LOVE to do that for you! I wouldn't be the only one! It's a shame I'm on the other side of the planet. If I win some money at the casino I'll fly up and help you out! *I actually really would!* lol

DeepSink wrote:My vote is nude, deep, and slow. And throw in some inverted stuff! -DeepSink

To all who read QSF members who read this message, especially the admin: Would you please advise me of the rules and personal opinions as to what level or eroticism is welcomed here? As far as photos go, members have made it clear that nudity (including male) is not frowned upon, even when male arousal is quite evident, as in steve84's very fine pix. But what about photos of solo climaxes, or couples (or more) of any gender combo? I'm want to make sure that I don't cross any lines of gentility or protocol with any future posts. I'm planning a vacation this summer wherein I intend to find some of the BC locations on the map and make my own (probably solo) photo and/or video shoots. If anyone can get free, say early August, I could really appreciate someone to operate cameras for me (no pay, just fun) , since I will be otherwise alone. Please let me know what you think about my question, and, if you think you might be interested in running a camera early August 2011, please let me know about that, also. Good Sinking! =DeepSink

DeepSink wrote:If anyone can get free, say early August, I could really appreciate someone to operate cameras for me (no pay, just fun) , since I will be otherwise alone. Please let me know what you think about my question, and, if you think you might be interested in running a camera early August 2011, please let me know about that, also. Good Sinking! =DeepSink

Well I'll be visiting all over America with my hubby from start of August to middle of August. Unfortunately my itinerary is pretty full of sites and attractions typical of a first time tourist to America, hehe. ^.^ Perhaps I'll have more free holidaying time the following year....after having glimpsed America Attractions 101 this August.

Where is BC? I might be passing by on my trip.

Scruff.

ScruffPup wrote:Where is BC? I might be passing by on my trip. --Scruff.

BC = British Columbia, Canada. According to the Google map (you can link to it from the "General Forums" section in topic "Sinking Locations for Everyone...) and lots of personal reports I've read from QSF members (most notably Boggy Man), British Columbia north of Washington State and Idaho State (USA) has several AWESOME peat bogs and mud sites. I've also added a very good, deep mud site located in Southwest Washington state. Again, reference the Google map. I hope you have a good time in USA. Let me know if you're going to be around Pacific NW in August. _DeepSink

DeepSink wrote:To all who read QSF members who read this message, especially the admin: Would you please advise me of the rules and personal opinions as to what level or eroticism is welcomed here? As far as photos go, members have made it clear that nudity (including male) is not frowned upon, even when male arousal is quite evident, as in steve84's very fine pix.

I'm not a moderator, but I'm willing to put forth my opinion.

I think you should go into all of the producer's areas and click on lots of stuff to see what the girls are up to in there, and from that you can easily see what has already been allowed. The girls masturbate to orgasm in the mud and they definitely go nude. They also get pretty hot with each other in the mud.

So, all that's been done. Your "model" (or "models", should it come to pass) simply won't look like that.

I vote in favor of you going as far as you like. But not being a moderator, I can't actually lay down the guideline of just how far that really can be!

Mods?

Nessie

DeepSink wrote:

DeepSink wrote:My vote is nude, deep, and slow. And throw in some inverted stuff! -DeepSink

To all who read QSF members who read this message, especially the admin: Would you please advise me of the rules and personal opinions as to what level or eroticism is welcomed here?.....

This is an adult board with no limits other than those stated in the rules viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29

Dave

I prefer to see men sink nude, that's always nice, but if not don't go with anything dressy, or over the top. A pair of boxers would be sexy, or even just three quarter lengths and a T shirt would be better than a jock strap! (In my opinion. To those of you who like your Jock Straps, I have nothing against)

Muddytrail wrote:I prefer to see men sink nude, that's always nice, but if not don't go with anything dressy, or over the top. A pair of boxers would be sexy, or even just three quarter lengths and a T shirt would be better than a jock strap! (In my opinion. To those of you who like your Jock Straps, I have nothing against)

Then naked it is!