Another new day a new resumption

[cerberus]

Getting very better, only the face is sometimes a hard fight..

00001.png

00002.png

These are good, it looks like you are getting there. The number of steps you are using is surprisingly high and you seem to be showing a lot of settings that I haven't touched. This maybe because I'm using Cuda and you aren't or you've blitzed the settings tab. We can add an extension called ADetailer to help with the faces, it isn't infallible (hopeless with horizontal faces etc), but helps. It might be useful to use the scripts facility for experimentation as well, that has some options for X/Y grids that may help optimise settings. I'm going to be out most of the day but will go through these things later.

[Scarol]

I think you should make a print screen of your settings, I think I made a mess of it, I think I overuse some settings what I shouldn't have to do.
And how about the Cuda thing, how can I check or upgrade?

[MadMax359]

so I'm a beast... and you're a beauty! i can live with that!

see, the "now will you help?" damsel, she gets it!

[cerberus]

I think you should make a print screen of your settings, I think I made a mess of it, I think I overuse some settings what I shouldn't have to do.
And how about the Cuda thing, how can I check or upgrade?

Doing a screen print of all the parameters wouldn't be easy, there are hundreds of them. Fortunately the last image you posted has the meta data intact (the jpgs and some of the smaller pngs don't). Below is a screen print of SD Prompt Reader for that image, I've highlighted the settings I was concerned in red. On my system these are all set to zero, as I've never had reason to change them.

Screenshot_6.jpg

In the SD Settings tab these are named as follows:

Token Merging Ratio
Token Merging Ration for Hires Pass
Negative Guidance Minimum Sigma
Sigma Min
Sigma Max
Sigma Churn
Sigma Tmin
Sigma Tmax
Sigma Noise

If you didn't set some/any of these it's possible that they were set by one of the command line arguments, in which case leave them. That said the Sigma Min and Sigma Max values don't look right, I think they are meant to be negative numbers. Some of these settings may be of benefit, It could be worth testing to see whether they help or not.

The other one it looks like you set is Clip Skip, it was showing as 2, the default is 1, This should be OK, I don't usually use it but it did help here. On my first test I ended up with and image with two heads and changing Clip Skip to 2 fixed it.

Below is a screen dump of my test with your prompt, negative prompt and other settings. I played around with the number of steps, hires steps, CFG scale and Denoise strength. It was quite interesting, with the Denoise Strength up to .7 she's wearing a bra, .8 it becomes as sports bra, .9 it becomes a crop top and at 1 it's a t-shirt!. It seems to do the switch during the Hires Fix stage, it is like it restarts the sampling. Normally you are OK with Hires steps set to about half the number you have for the Sampler steps. The images I generated weren't the same as yours in spite of the prompts and seed being the same. That's probably due to the fact that our machines are different. Anyway I was able to get images with the settings in the screen dump below:

Screenshot_7.jpg

With regard to Cuda, I think it's fairly recent and your graphics card may predate it. A more recent version of the card suffixed "ti" has Cuda. I'm not sure, but I don't think it can be used with earlier cards.

[cerberus]

so I'm a beast... and you're a beauty! i can live with that!

Well, nice of you to say so, not sure how you got to know what I look like though, that's a bit worrying.

see, the "now will you help?" damsel, she gets it!

I thought those two images worked well together.

Pics but no captions tonight, bit difficult to type with a cat laying on my arm.

00630-4052039610.png

00639-1574613190.png

00674-1920586703.png

00833-506478146.png

[cerberus]

Seconds

00243-2429325347.png

00462-2341709777.png

00275-3877673642.png

00309-4004301709.png

00359-1845273226.png

[Scarol]

Hi Cerberus, thank you for the information.
If you indeed upscale to 2, you get 2 people, so upscale must remain at 1.

Today I downloaded a newer version from SD and got a few more options.
I downloaded the option with details for eyes, hands and body, but I did not find much improvement (or is put the wrong settings)

I use the same seed because otherwise I get too different beautiful women haha. However, I cannot yet get the correct sharpness of the entire body under control, the quicksand and splashes can be achieved, but getting the body and face extremely sharp is difficult, could that really be due to my graphics card?

My new laptop is maybe two years old, I did install a cuda card (software) today but I didn't really notice the difference, if it is because of my video card that I have to have a stronger video card built in it, I hope not, then I wouldn't be able to get a single photo as sharp as yours.

[cerberus]

Hi Cerberus, thank you for the information.
If you indeed upscale to 2, you get 2 people, so upscale must remain at 1.

Today I downloaded a newer version from SD and got a few more options.
I downloaded the option with details for eyes, hands and body, but I did not find much improvement (or is put the wrong settings)

I use the same seed because otherwise I get too different beautiful women haha. However, I cannot yet get the correct sharpness of the entire body under control, the quicksand and splashes can be achieved, but getting the body and face extremely sharp is difficult, could that really be due to my graphics card?

My new laptop is maybe two years old, I did install a cuda card (software) today but I didn't really notice the difference, if it is because of my video card that I have to have a stronger video card built in it, I hope not, then I wouldn't be able to get a single photo as sharp as yours.

I take it by "upscale" you meant "clip skip", when I did it I wasn't getting two people, I was getting ne person with two heads. Setting clip skip to two causes the last stage of image generation to be skipped, this may have an impact on quality but it doesn't seem to be much.

OK you've got an updated version and you have ADetailer loaded now. ADetailer is more useful when fixing faces for people at a distance, SD sometime screws these up badly and ADetailer resolves this. For close-ups it doesn't make a lot of difference except for the eyes, it is still worth doing those I find.

Ah, so you can download the Cuda software. Did you remember to take the argument that suppressed use of Cuda out of your webui-user.bat script? That would stop it using Cuda if you didn't.

If you want to check to see if SD is using Cuda, you can do this using the Task Manager (right-click on the taskbar and about the third option from the bottom):

Screenshot_10.jpg

Click Performance tab and select GPU option. Next change one of the graph plots to Cuda (if available), then run a generate and watch the graph in the Task Manager, if it looks like this you have Cuda working.

Screenshot_11.jpg

When the generate finishes the Cuda plot should drop back to zero.

[MadMax359]

that splotch of mud on the 4th damsel's forehead... looks to me like the Cult High Priest anointed their sacrificial victim before pushing her in
can anyone save her?

[Scarol]

I use Stable Difussion Master, wich Stable Diffusion version do you use? I succeeded to make this sharp image

00001-43255555563.png