Redjak's finally started using AI

[MadMax359]

I guess at this point whatever inspires me gets a vid, though I still feel a way about thread hijacking.

So yeah, Little Red Sinking Hood?

Hey, don't fret Sekani.

If you see something of mine that gets your creative juices flowing and results in a neat video, then that's a win-win-win situation as far as I can see. A win for me because my thread gets the videos that it otherwise wouldn't. A win for you because we all get to see your expertise. And a win for all the other members who get to see the evolution of an idea from a still image to a moving one.

Cheers!

Redjak.

a win for the damsels IF someone gets there in time??

[Gitget]

Great picture!
Thanks for the info and for trying to make a video.
I understand how hard the software is; I tried and just can't get the hang of it.

[redjak6t4]

Same image, same prompt, three video generators. Which one did it best?

The last one Sekani. The MiniMax.

Because of that 'burp' made by the mud just after she went under. That's what sold it for me. Having said that, the amount of thrashing she did beforehand was probably more than should have been possible if she were as tightly tied up as I'd like. But no matter.

Anyway, this was a very nice surprise to come back to... so thanks very much!

Oddly enough, of that batch of postings this one, Meredith, was my least fave. Because the image quality wasn't as sharp and clean as I'd have liked. Which makes me wonder why you chose to make it into a video. I'm not complaining here. Quite the opposite. I love it. Instead I'm just curious about your choice when Karen or Erin were much cleaner images, with higher resolution.

Was it the the lurid green colour of the muck? Or the fact that there's no other background details - only the girl and the mud?

I hope you don't mind me asking, btw.

Redjak.

[MadMax359]

when i suggested Redjak's scene of Katarina Nikita for a short video, he found the full sized photo he used

i wonder if the two of you could partner up again?
if it' too difficult to do both, pick one?

i know... easy for me to say!

qsdlmm.jpg

[redjak6t4]

when i suggested Redjak's scene of Katarina Nikita for a short video, he found the full sized photo he used

i wonder if the two of you could partner up again?
if it' too difficult to do both, pick one?

i know... easy for me to say!

qsdlmm.jpg

Hi Max,

I'm very happy with all of the videos Sekani's made from my still images.

A while back he was polite enough to ask me if he could do so and now we have a good working relationship. He can dip into this thread any time he likes and make videos out of any image that catches his eye. Now that you've posted a really old QS fake of mine I suppose that my old thread of photomanips are fair game for him too. I'd be delighted if he were to bring some of them to life.

Here's a link to it. viewtopic.php?f=15&t=24065

Oh and I posted something with you specifically in mind a little while ago.

Alexis.png

Yes, I know that its missing two important things of interest - but that's Grok for you.

Thanks,

Redjak

[redjak6t4]

Who knows?

If you ask Sekani nicely he might be able to make a video of Alexis with her 'assets' on display, wobbling and shaking as she struggles?

[redjak6t4]

Hello again Gitget,

Now that I'm back from vacation I'll start working on your request.

FYI, the process is quite an involved one. It takes time and there's no solid guarantee of success. I have a number of candidate images ready, all of them showing girls blowing or deep throating lucky guys. But as we now know Grok has a very strict set of censorship protocols in place, so I can't just order it to... 'draw this man and woman in deep mud'. That's a 100 per cent no-no.

Instead I have to interrogate it by asking it to describe the image I upload to it. This tells me what it understands about the image in question. Most likely it will recognise that it shows a woman with a man's erect penis in her mouth. But you never can tell with AI. Just yesterday I asked it describe this image...

dkr8qmk-9b944dd2-9622-4b55-83ab-89289d34edc3-cutout.png

...and it told me that it was an image of woman in a tight corset with a laced-up tail running down her back. You and I have no trouble seeing that her arms are laced up in an armbinder. But Grok couldn't see it.

Anyway, if Grok [u]does[/u] recognise that I uploaded an oral sex image to it, then that particular avenue is closed off to me. It simply won't cooperate and generate an image of the man and the woman in deep mud.

My next ploy is to try and trick it by judiciously masking out certain parts of their anatomy and seeing how it reacts to that. If it doesn't register what I'm doing it might play ball and generate a deep mud image for me - without any genitalia, of course! They will have to be photoshopped into the image by me by hand.

So as you can probably being to realize Gitget, the images you'd like me to create for you take a lot of time, much thought, careful wording of the prompts, visual trickery and a lot of luck. Therefore, please be patient. I really can't say when or even if I can pull this off for you. But I will certainly give it my best shot.

Thanks,

Redjak.

[MadMax359]

the 2 Important Things are implied!

but a great link to the good old days, when they could be free!

[redjak6t4]

the 2 Important Things are implied!

but a great link to the good old days, when they could be free!

All is not lost tho', Max. Sometimes a hybrid mix of AI and Photoshop can produce a satisfying result. As you can see from Helene's outstanding contribution to this batch posting.

Brianna.png

chained.png

Charlotte.png

Helene.png

Kellie.png

lana.png

Margot.png

Siobahn.png

[Sekani]

Oddly enough, of that batch of postings this one, Meredith, was my least fave. Because the image quality wasn't as sharp and clean as I'd have liked. Which makes me wonder why you chose to make it into a video. I'm not complaining here. Quite the opposite. I love it. Instead I'm just curious about your choice when Karen or Erin were much cleaner images, with higher resolution.

Was it the the lurid green colour of the muck? Or the fact that there's no other background details - only the girl and the mud?

I hope you don't mind me asking, btw.

I don't put as much thought into it as you'd think. Just if I see something that sparks my imagination I go for it. Sometimes I'll see something that maybe I could do some experiments on (which was the most recent case) and those tend to be more simple and straightforward. Image quality is largely fixable so I don't concern myself with that too much.