bogbud wrote:A whole lot them looks really good.
Although i guess the A.I. (yet) has no idea about the right (distressed) attitude the models should have. Most of them look like they are posing or having a good time.
Is it possible to create a wader-booted girl like my avatar?
Part of it is that the AI needs to be told what the emotion should be. Like a search engine, it provides the best match based on algorithm data. For example, an image with tags like "wet shirt" and "nipples showing" may have a chance of returning a character that has a blushing face, but it might not. If you say "embarrassed", it's an abstract feeling that a machine doesn't feel, but its algorithm is likely to bring up blushing, maybe even turn the character's head in shame, but it isn't the same as specifying it. The more specific the parameters, the more precise the image result.
The better you are at describing specific things in incredibly specific detail, the more the AI will work for you. As I've discovered, it's really hard to capture what we think of as "quicksand", so I've had better luck with "mud" and "sand", but there's no way that I can see to make the AI submerge to a specific level or body part, hence the need for source images, but the AI can struggle to decide how far it strays from it depending on Strength - lower means it replicates the original closer, but the style is horrible because it tries to duplicate the exact style without transforming it. Too much freedom, and it completely changes it (e.g. changes perspective, angle, depth, etc.).
From my experience so far, it's very good at generating ideas for you. For example, in reading a novel recently,I was trying to visualise a particular character who walks into a room realising that their thin t-shirt is see-through and her nipples are visible.I plugged in the parameters with what I interpreted to be in the scene, and it generated something that looked very close to what I imagined it to be. However, since I didn't have a specific vision of what they had to look like, I wasn't as fussed about the final result.
Anyway, I ran your image a few times. These were the best results.