Re: Viridian's AI Experiments
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2022 3:20 am
More experimenting here. NovelAI has three builds: Curated (for stability and consistency), Full (for better and but less predictable results) and Furry (for... you know, Furry art).
Shockingly, we discovered that Furry has the BEST mud/quicksand textures, at the cost of the AI trying to turn your character into a furry. The tags now have try to stop the AI from turning my reporter into a brown fox with boobs. The textures are so much better though.
Here's the comparison.
The first is the "Full" AI. I had to edit the generated image to input flat colours and ripple lines to get the AI to see that there were ripples in the sand. I ran the same edited graphic through Furry, added a bunch of tags to specify the texture and made it as clear as possible that the character is human, and generated two more. These are the results.
The AI used for Furry is insanely better at rendering mud, slime, etc. It's interesting to see where/how it built up that divergence from the regular Anime model.
Shockingly, we discovered that Furry has the BEST mud/quicksand textures, at the cost of the AI trying to turn your character into a furry. The tags now have try to stop the AI from turning my reporter into a brown fox with boobs. The textures are so much better though.
Here's the comparison.
The first is the "Full" AI. I had to edit the generated image to input flat colours and ripple lines to get the AI to see that there were ripples in the sand. I ran the same edited graphic through Furry, added a bunch of tags to specify the texture and made it as clear as possible that the character is human, and generated two more. These are the results.
The AI used for Furry is insanely better at rendering mud, slime, etc. It's interesting to see where/how it built up that divergence from the regular Anime model.