water_bug_62208 wrote:reisen55 is asking what we think of Jillian Michaels in quicksand or peat, not what we think of her in general.
Oh, my bad, gotcha. Sorry, I didn't realize what was being asked I guess, thanks for clearing it up

Then in that case, I think she would look ugly in quicksand or peat.
water_bug_62208 wrote:And, with that, Duncan's point is very well-taken... why is it necessary to call her ugly or call her names? Calling her ugly or calling her names is not the purpose or intent of this thread. Calling her ugly or calling her names is off-topic for the purpose of this thread, particularly within this Public Area. Under, "General Discussion," you'll notice it says, "Sink Into On-Topic Discussions." Please keep things on-topic here.
Look guy, the dude asked for peoples' opinion, and I gave exactly what he was asking for. Obviously I'm not calling her ugly to be mean to her, as it's a pretty safe bet she'll never see this thread, right? Dude asked for opinions from people, and that was mine. Wasn't doing it to become a pariah or anything, that's just honestly what I think, and have always thought, since long before this thread was made. In addition to what I personally perceive to be an ugly man-jaw-face and a flat and unattractive body, she also always has this smug-looking expression that, just something about it makes me genuniely hate her. She could be sweet as candy for all I know, I've only seen pictures of her, and I hate looking at her.
But you're right, only the positive opinions that conform with yours are to be considered "on-topic."
Fact: Opinion was asked for by OP, opinion was given by me. My opinion is just as relevant and "on-topic" as yours or anyone else's.
Fact: White-knighting Jillian Michaels won't lead to you getting to fuck her.