A question (Moved)

Sink Into On-Topic Discussions
User avatar
MadMax359
Posts: 5541
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:07 pm
Location: north carolina

Re: A question (Moved)

Postby MadMax359 » Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:12 am

I don't mind small tattoos; belly button rings and small nose rings can be quite cute... but what's most important to me are a pretty face the curviness of the damsel

the one model that I wish hadn't gotten so inked is Paris Kennedy... I know it's her body and her choice, but it's my choice how I react, and I think she went way overboard :twisted:
The strong do what they want, the weak do what they must

bogmaiden
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:07 am

Re: A question (Moved)

Postby bogmaiden » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:47 am

I agree with you about Paris, Madmax. As for the maiden's curves, I love them, too, but I want the mud itself to decorate those curves, the mire to accent their shapeliness. After all, that's what its really all about, right?

joedeep130535
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: A question (Moved)

Postby joedeep130535 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:00 pm

Have to agree"its her body" My choice would be no tattoos or piercings but would not leave a tattooed lady to drown!!

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: A question

Postby Duncan Edwards » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:25 pm

schlamm wrote:I think it is an indication of the available wealth of material now as opposed to 15 years ago.... back then ANYONE actually photographed in mud, let alone sinking or stuck, was a rarity.
Now we can nit-pick hair color, style, attire, tattoos, etc...and no, this isn't intended to be a slam of Bogmaiden, just a reminder of how far things have progressed in a relatively short period of time 8-)


I think you are on to something there. In Feb. '95 I had exactly two quicksand pictures to pick from that I had never seen before and I was in Heaven over it. Now I have access to literally thousands so something had to fill all that space.

If I had it my way there would be no such thing as trying to decorate the already perfect creation of the female form with permanent improvement. However, I learned about 12 years ago that I don't get to have it my way. My wife got a ring in her navel to celebrate having a flat stomach at forty. I told her it reminded me of when Playboy Centerfolds still had a staple in the center. (She laughed. Fortunately) Over the years I got used to it only it's been replaced by a small diamond so she looks like some kind of hoochie goochie dancer. At least she's MY hoochie goochie dancer. :)

Kristine has some terrific artwork on her back. It works well for her. It fits.

The point is that women like to decorate stuff. Houses, yards, holidays, faces, bodies, hair, you name it. Frequently the more extroverted or outrageous the woman the wilder the decoration. Like it or not the ink and the studs go with the territory.
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Quicksand-Lover-7 and 0 guests