redjak6t4 wrote:Interesting, huh?
Very. I don’t think I’d feel comfortable describing myself using any words that end in ‘phile’ but I have to admit that at one time or another I may have skirted close to exhibiting certain paraphilic disorder tendencies, if what Grok said was accurate. However as carried away as my fetishes and fantasies sometimes get I’ve never felt the urge to ever harm anyone.
redjak6t4 wrote:It also describes where Max and I diverge. He and I are tit men, through and through and we both like women in bondage as well. But he follows the Saviour path and wants to save the damsel as a prelude to having hot sex with her. Whereas I follow the other, darker route and want to see the damsel go under, swallowed up forever in the muddy darkness.
Just as the article says, I want to do no actual harm to any woman and confine my fetish purely to my imagination. I'd imagine that's the same for you, Max and lots of us here.
I figured as much that you guys were into tits. Your content screams it; the quick, deep plunges down to a set of big, buoyant boobies. I myself am a leg guy, and prefer the slow sinking scenes with a lot of struggling thighs and wiggling hips. Most of my content (written or otherwise) focuses on that aspect, not exclusively but inclusively.
I don’t mind the occasional scenario that ends tragically. Sometimes it can be really fucking hot, just as certain rescue scenes can be just as appealing. I also like the cliffhanger endings, where the audience is left to decide in their own minds what happens to the desperate damsel.
Thanks for sharing that Grok analysis. That was really eye opening.