Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

No political or religious topics please. Otherwise, anything goes, as long as we treat each other with respect.
User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby kham » Mon Apr 25, 2016 4:31 pm

The full video is here
Just what it says; complete sequence of events from the collision to the breakup. The simulation looks like it is based on the latest available computer modeling of the sinking. The sound effects for groaning metal and compartments collapsing is chilling at best. Some very good internal work too. They really put a lot of money and effort into this

User avatar
PM2K
Always Remembered
Posts: 8693
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:14 pm
Location: Eastern Ontario

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby PM2K » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:25 pm

I saw this. Very cool! Gives a good impression of what it was like.

User avatar
Mynock
Posts: 2933
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 pm
Location: PA

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby Mynock » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:26 am

Explains why the back half is so mangled, all the air forcing it's way out under pressure just tore it apart. Cool vid, although I'll admit to doing some fast forwarding. 8-)
"Know thyself, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories."
--Sun Tzu

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby kham » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:09 pm

The venting steam section was good for a sleep aid when needing a nap :D But generally it was a good watch

User avatar
nachtjaeger
Posts: 2373
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:45 am
Location: upstate NY USA
Contact:

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby nachtjaeger » Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:58 pm

Still bugs me- why in hell did the Captain order the engines reversed? The Titanic had three screws- the port and starboard screws were powered by conventional reciprocating steam engines- but the center screw was driven by a steam turbine, using the exhaust from the other two engines. The center screw was forward of the rudder also. If he'd ordered the starboard engine ahead emergency, and the port engine reversed, she might have actually been able to turn quick enough to miss the 'berg, especially with the wash from the center screw impinging on the rudder. Or just order "Hard a-port, left full rudder!" (Or did the Titanic still have a tiller? Have to check on that.) Anyway, she'd have kept steerageway. I also read speculation that if she had run head-on into the berg, it would have been a terrible accident- but it might not have sunk her.
This space for rent- advertise your product or service here!

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby kham » Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:13 pm

He didn't
Current theory is that the engines were placed in "STOP" which at the time, was Standard Procedure. This is backed up by survivors from the Titanic's Black Gang. Also , going Full Astern Port is a good theoretical answer, but utterly unheard of in 1912 shiphandling. And yes, the terminology "Hard-a-Starboard" while spinning the wheel to port, is indeed a throwback to when ships had an actual tiller like a dory. The terminology was altered after the accident specifically here , to avoid confusion. Only America persists to this day in Left and Right rudder for reasons that, because, or asshole, are the only thing I can come up with :D
Striking the berg head on is a modern conceit, with the assumption that she would be able to survive the impact better rather than shearing open her bilge. It's possible. It just doesn't happen to be in the toolbox of any mariner in existence at the time. Simply ordering Full Astern, may not have even been able to take effect before impact. It's one of those things that look good in 2016 but in 1912 its more like "are you fucking crazy??"

User avatar
Mynock
Posts: 2933
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 pm
Location: PA

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby Mynock » Sat Apr 30, 2016 9:56 am

I've heard the head on theory too but when you look at the math.......50,000 ton ship going 20 knots hitting a solid object that had to weight at least 100,000 tons.......early 1900s era riveted hull.......nah. Half the ship would've turned into a crumple zone and what didn't would've gone down like a rock.
I think somebody did an experiment with models that proved (sort of) that if they'd left all three engines at full and just turned they would've missed it, which makes sense to me...... More engine power = more water over the rudder = tighter turn (I would think, but I've never driven anything bigger than a jet ski).
"Know thyself, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories."
--Sun Tzu

User avatar
The Great Red Spot
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 7:46 pm

Re: Titanic sinks in Real Time - 2 Hours 40 Minutes

Postby The Great Red Spot » Thu Jan 18, 2018 3:34 pm

That's actually a video game under development called Titanic Honor and Glory.


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests