Technically, aren't all WMDs considered equal? Not that we'd respond with nukes to a chemical attack on Seoul, but I think that's how the law goes.
Best thing that could happen to the people of the DPRK (NK) is for their so-called leadership to be taken out. Might take a generation to sort things out again (like with East Germany) but everybody will be better off. And then there's Venezuela. I almost wish we had an excuse to go in there before the famine gets any worse and more people are shot down in the streets.
kham wrote:a) There is still, NO valid evidence he actually has functional Atomics
b) Firing one at Stennis's Battle Group, the SAM defences would blow it out of the sky
c) If that was REAL , and salvage-fuses to initiate, thus proving, he actually has just used atomic weapons against the United States...
d) Strategic Policy for 6 decades is to REPLY IN KIND. Kim Dong small, gets fucking incinerated by actual , REAL , thermonuclear weapons
Also THAAD is deployed and active, so inbounds targeted on Seoul would be engaged
And It should be known (the retardo-spazoids in ''media'' likely have no clue..) that Chemys employed would be same as using nukes under strategic responses. And , He should worry more about the ROKs; I shit you NOT. Those guys are BADASS motherfucking soldiers. They would slaughter every fucking NK they found. Nevermind if they had a uniform or not