Another new day a new resumption

[Scarol]

Maybe it'my settings a problem on Stable Fusion, what are your settings inside the program? Maybe I activated the wrong options.

[cerberus]

A few more:

"OK, who pushed me?"

00671-2356770414.png

"Deeper than this? Oh God, I wasn't expecting that!"

00384-3306297106.png

"Hmm, this way or that way? Why do they always look equally dangerous?"

00738-106051175.png

The race was on. The handicap system was quite interesting - ten pounds of scrap metal down the back of the pants!

00782-3825165610.png

"Big breaths now." ..."Thank you for noticing!"

00783-2232361740.png

[cerberus]

I do things out of nothing
I did maximum sampling steps 150 and CFG scale maximum 30, thats very overdone but still something isn't right, how does everyone het ultra high sharp photo's and I get 60%70% sharp photo's, something still isnt right.'Do you also use the program "Hugging Face'. Some people say the program is needed but think that's bullshit.

You shouldn't need to go that high with the number of sampling steps, but raising it a bit could help. Usually high CFG scales result in colour artefacts and strange images. In my case I get fuzzy images if I lower the Denoising Strength, so it could be worth you putting that up. In your prompt you left out the "photography" after "high quality", this will result in a more CGI type image but probably won't affect sharpness.

Hugging Face isn't a program, it's a forum where SD user can discuss matters and post useful tips and resources. I've never used it myself.

When you do a generate check the CMD window (black rectangle with white lettering in task bar to see if any errors are being displayed. It may be that your generates aren't fully completing.

[cerberus]

Maybe it'my settings a problem on Stable Fusion, what are your settings inside the program? Maybe I activated the wrong options.

I haven't really changed any of the Stable Diffusion settings other than adding a VAE for SDXL (you don't need this at the moment). I can't think of any others I've changed.

[Scarol]

Thanks for your info, I will check later if I can see what’s wrong, there’s defenitely some things still wrong, you generate the best beautiful quality photos while I generate not best quality. I hope soon I have the right settings. Stable diffusion is really fun but so annoying to do not have the best photos.

[cerberus]

Thanks for your info, I will check later if I can see what’s wrong, there’s defenitely some things still wrong, you generate the best beautiful quality photos while I generate not best quality. I hope soon I have the right settings. Stable diffusion is really fun but so annoying to do not have the best photos.

There was another message from you after the one above but that one has disappeared. Did you fix the problem?

I tried putting the Cuda suppression argument in my bat script to start SD, it stopped my system using Cuda but didn't affect quality much, so I don't think that's the problem.

[Scarol]

Yes, there was a error message that the file create UI was missing as attribe to the modelus, I found out I downloaded 2 versions of Stable Difussion, The web ui and a web ui master version, but one of the two starts Stable Difussion correct and the other has errors but I don't know wich version is the correct one before I delete te wrong one

[MadMax359]

a very bold front!

not stuck--- just mesmerized at a distance... she might be the most beautiful damsel i've seen in the swamp

[MadMax359]

and the more big breaths, the more i appreciate the way you heard that...

[Scarol]

I share two photos, I think for 80% sharp

00024-1561766927.jpeg

tmpsntsuqx6.png