Redjak's finally started using AI

[redjak6t4]

That was the perilous side of the coin.

Now for the pleasurable.

Agatha.png

Berenice.png

Katya.png

Polly.png

Roxana.png

Tiana.png

Did I save the best till last?

[redjak6t4]

Meanwhile, poor Christine's still trying to find a way out of Redjak's underground lair.

Christine is still lost in the dark.png

Will she escape?

[MadMax359]

Jeanette 1 isn't exactly what i crave--- but she's got a great body, sunk to a wonderful depth!

[MadMax359]

meanwhile Agatha, Berenice, Roxana are all lovely, yes Tiana is the best!

but actually escaping? not from your clutches!

[redjak6t4]

meanwhile Agatha, Berenice, Roxana are all lovely, yes Tiana is the best!

but actually escaping? not from your clutches!

Oh no, Max.

I'm pursuing two entirely different themes these days.

Any images of lovely ladies in mud and quicksand are just cheesecake for the delectation of the membership. If you want to assign any meaning or a kind of scenario to these glamour pics, then I suppose you could imagine them as models posing for some lucky photographer. Or perhaps these are the kinky activities of couples who are into WAM, mud play and quicksand fantasies.

But any images featuring bondage, gags, mummification, extreme peril, monsters, distress or fear are the territory of Redjak, the Quicksand Killer. What happens in his lair stays in his lair. That's why I said there were two sides to the same coin - peril and pleasure. That's why I made two separate postings on these two different themes. That's also why Christine is still hopping, shuffling and blundering around in the dark.

Escape from Redjak's clutches is either impossible or a carefully contrived trick so that his victims will believe (for a while) that they can escape.

[JSample]

The first damsel above looks like her hair is turning into mud in all the right (or wrong) places...

[redjak6t4]

You can thank Grok's censorship policy for that, JSample.


I've discovered that if you feed an image of a topless damsel into Grok and instruct it to sink her up to her waist, it'll usually do one of three things.

1. Block the instruction with the message, 'Content Moderated. Pick another idea.'

2. Coat the damsel's breasts with a layer of mud so that the areas of interest can't be seen.

3. Sink the damsel deeper than instructed so that her breasts are below the mud's surface.

Now we can add a fourth.

4. Obscure the damsel's nipples by converting her hair into mud and it draping over them.


But I'm wondering if I can bypass this road closure using photoshop.

If Grok takes option 2 and generates a damsel with a mud-covered cleavage maybe I can align the original image I fed into it with the one it generated and 'Clone' her naked breasts back onto her. But this would be extremely difficult work and has to be pixel-perfect to yield a believable end result.

I don't know if I can swing this, but now that you've drawn attention to the issue, perhaps I will give it a try. My experiments will be done privately at first and if they work, only then will I post the results here. I'm not making any promises and the time frame for this will be my own. We'll just have to wait and see.


Thanks,


Redjak.

[JSample]

The AIs I use will often do the same sort of thing, such as sinking the woman deeply enough so that you can't see her nipples, or put her hands in strategic places, or actually slap a mud-colored bikini top onto her, as you can see here:
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=29909&start=50#p175921

[MadMax359]

Certainly one can see your Pleasure images just that way--- consensual models or lovers or whatever

but in my vision they're more likely agents or reporters or spies in the clutches of a villain who means to end their meddling! but the brave damsels don't want to show their inner anxiety as they figure out how to Escape!

[MadMax359]

the issue of programs finding ways to cover up nipples reminds of the Men's Magazines of my youth... always with impossible scraps of clothing hiding what i wanted to see!