rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Sink Into On-Topic Discussions
User avatar
stefani_tg
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:26 pm
Contact:

rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby stefani_tg » Sat May 30, 2009 2:52 am

having written two stories bout sexual play in quicksand, some of which was inspired by the rather raw mpv 'rubbing' and 'erotic' vids (paris and violet spring to mind) i wondered if any of the mpv makers could tell us how they got the idea for those... i know for some qs is purely fetish but was it very much a fantasy to see a girl 'go all the way' like that?

i seem to recall when i first found the qs community back in the late 90s and before vid makers like mpv and 558 were around there were quite a few stories (most by derek jayson?) where a girl would sink but then find sexual pleasure in it. were vids a natural progression from this?

also i know most of the models had a background in adult material anyway or went on to it... how did they react to the request - and actual filming - of the qs and mud 'rubbing/ero' vids?

:oops:
sites n forums bout gals in quicksand cos guys luv chicks who are dirtee n wet!

;-D

User avatar
quagmire_uk
Posts: 1456
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:04 am

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby quagmire_uk » Sun May 31, 2009 5:03 am

I really enjoyed in the running in the mud videos. Ususually I'm just a fan of slow sinking (either erotic or dramatic), and not so much a fan of wallowing in mud, rolling around and having fun, mud wrestling etc, but it turns out that when a lady is vigorously rubbing like THAT no sinking is required! ;)

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4886
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby Duncan Edwards » Sun May 31, 2009 8:45 am

For whatever part "rubbing" has played in anything I've done I can't recall any specific thing that provided the idea. It just seemed natural that since this was a sexual fetish that some sort of pleasure should be taken in doing it. When you see any video I think really what you are seeing is a reflection of what many in the community wish they were seeing or personally doing. It probably goes much deeper than this for some but to me it's almost logical.

As for getting the ladies involved it's not hard at all. Yes, some performers are professionals and will do just about anything on cue without a second thought. Others just think it is a really interesting or different way to have a good time. Some get turned on at the thought that others are watching and they really like the idea. All are natural exhibitionists and are very uninhibited or they wouldn't be doing this to begin with. We don't have to beg them, nor would we, to do this. Logistics, talent, location, wardrobe, technical stuff, are all far more difficult to manage than just asking the ladies what you would like them to do.

Dave would probably have more to offer on this. 8-)
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

Fred588
Producer
Posts: 17902
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:37 pm
Location: Central Arkansas (At Studio 588)
Contact:

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby Fred588 » Sun May 31, 2009 10:18 am

I agree completely with what Duncan has said regarding what models will or won't do and getting them to do it. With the models the key is, without doubt, making very sure they know, prior to being hired, what will be expected. Some models are uncomfortable topless so expectations in that regard are essential to be communicated. Others are grossed out by the idea of getting muddy, by the possible presence of bees or snakes, or whatever. This needs to be discussed before one is assigned to a shoot.

Duncan is also quite correct that issues of logistics, wardrobe, and crew are much more difficult.
Studio 588 currently offers more than 2200 different HD and QD quicksand videos and has supported production of well over 2400 video scenes and other projects by 20 different producers. Info may be found at:
http://studio588qs.com
http://quicksandland.com
http://psychicworldjungleland.com

User avatar
dlodoski
Site Sponsor
Posts: 10668
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: The Land of Ooze
Contact:

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby dlodoski » Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:24 pm

stefani_tg wrote:having written two stories bout sexual play in quicksand, some of which was inspired by the rather raw mpv 'rubbing' and 'erotic' vids (paris and violet spring to mind) i wondered if any of the mpv makers could tell us how they got the idea for those... i know for some qs is purely fetish but was it very much a fantasy to see a girl 'go all the way' like that?

i seem to recall when i first found the qs community back in the late 90s and before vid makers like mpv and 558 were around there were quite a few stories (most by derek jayson?) where a girl would sink but then find sexual pleasure in it. were vids a natural progression from this?

also i know most of the models had a background in adult material anyway or went on to it... how did they react to the request - and actual filming - of the qs and mud 'rubbing/ero' vids?


The first 'rubbing' scene we did was with Violet. We had logged quite a few miles the day before while looking for locations. During that traveling, she revealed that most of the work she had done up to that point was porn. So I got the idea that we could have her do some explicit arousal stuff. Now, you have to bear in mind that we did arousal responses in '98 and 2000 (this was 2002). But I thought it would be cool to get nasty with it. Anyways, I was pleased with the results. And so we did that sort of material with every model that was suited for it from that point forward.

As far as pitching it to the models went, I would just explain that mud masturbation was an option, and that they would be paid extra for it. We run a professional set, and use mostly professional models. So it's understood that they are under no obligation to do things that are outside their comfort zone, and that we won't sweat them for turning down certain elements. That's definitely one advantage of paying a daily base pay and then going ala carte for 'extras'.

I really do like arousal elements as well as dramatic stuff. It's just like the MPV motto states - "It's not the mud on the women, it's the women in the mud!" 8-)

Dave
The Wizard of Ooze stays behind the curtain!

https://allmylinks.com/dlodoski

Stay signed up to Club MPV and bank 10 free download tokens every month!

User avatar
UberGaijin
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:08 pm
Contact:

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby UberGaijin » Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:52 pm

dlodoski wrote:The first 'rubbing' scene we did was with Violet.


Violet...*siiigh* :) :oops: If there is one "rubbing in the mud" vid which I REALLY love, it's "Violet in Lycra".

User avatar
Nessie
Producer
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:30 pm

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby Nessie » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:27 pm

Although I haven't seen "Rubbin' ", I did participate in the filmings of the nighttime torchlight erotic scenes done by PamelaRose, Kristine Lynn and Jenna West. Although those aren't quite as explicit, I don't think the finished scenes left much to the imagination either.

A personal observation:

At one time I wondered why anyone would show anybody having fun in quicksand. Hollywood always showed panic, fear, and possible grim demise and the whole quicksand fantasy seemed wrong to me if a model so much as cracked a smile.

Today, though, the Hollywood thing really seems like the fantasy to me. Torchlight (or "Rubbin' ") on the other hand, seems perfectly believable to me...it's what actually goes on.

Nessie

User avatar
nachtjaeger
Posts: 2843
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:45 am
Location: upstate NY USA
Contact:

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby nachtjaeger » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:11 pm

I've always fantasized about hiring a "professional" (as described) to do a QS video shoot. In my imagination, the conversation goes something like this:

"So, all I have to do is get naked, get in the mud, talk sexy to the camera, and act like sinking is the hottest thing I've ever felt?"

"That's all."

"And you're paying me that much?"

"Yep."

"Okay, what's the catch?"
This space for rent- advertise your product or service here!

User avatar
stefani_tg
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:26 pm
Contact:

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby stefani_tg » Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:16 am

thanx for the replies guys (and ness! :D always nice to have a girl view there)

i'm actually watching a sasha vid which is fairly explicit and wondered if im not pushing the subject in asking - do the girls actually 'go all the way' for themselves. i know adult films involve a fair bit of acting (ala when sally met harry) and good actresses are gonna be fairly indistinguishable from the real deal :o but... was it good for them? ;)

ness' comment is intresting too... the girls are having fun in qs and i'm almost disappointed that some of the better qs venues - 'desert mud bath' and 'paris ero' spring to mind - dont have any dramatic shootings in them we've seen yet. i have to fess im a recent convert to the ero/rubbin sets but only cos im a fan of particular types of qs and how it moves round anyone. my curiosity got the better of me when one kinda 'thrashing round' replaced the usual sort!

:? :oops:
sites n forums bout gals in quicksand cos guys luv chicks who are dirtee n wet!

;-D

therob
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:33 am

Re: rather frank question bout 'rubbing in the mud' :-o

Postby therob » Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:21 am

i thought all 3 rubbin films were fantastic.
out of intrest did you stop making them cause you felt you had covered that area or cause they wern't that popular?


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bill and 2 guests