F-35B

No political or religious topics please. Otherwise, anything goes, as long as we treat each other with respect.
User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

F-35B

Postby kham » Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:36 am

B-model Shipboard Suitability Testing

Interesting video, but it sure looks like a complicated piece of kit, with all those doors. That nozzle also looks pretty close to the deck on rotation. Fingers crossed.

User avatar
Mynock
Posts: 2933
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 pm
Location: PA

Re: F-35B

Postby Mynock » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:22 pm

Awesome. Now all they have to do is add a remote control package and it'll make a great target practice drone for our F-22's. :mrgreen:
Seriously, not bad. Wouldn't want to be the guy fixing/maintining all those secret doors but that was what? 50 ft of runway it needed to take off?
"Know thyself, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories."
--Sun Tzu

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-35B

Postby kham » Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:27 am

It's interesting that it uses a straight deck run rather than the ski ramp Harriers used.

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4258
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: F-35B

Postby Duncan Edwards » Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:13 am

kham wrote:It's interesting that it uses a straight deck run rather than the ski ramp Harriers used.


The ski ramp the Harriers needed on the rest of the worlds smaller carriers. Even the amphibious ships of the US "Gator Navy" offer more space than the British Invincible class or anything else out there. That and it screws up your compatibility with the full grown flat tops of the US navy. 8-)
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-35B

Postby kham » Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:23 pm

Yeah, but the -B is only useful on the Wasp-class, America-class or strips ashore; it has no arrestor hook, so cannot land shipboard in the standard trap configuration. I wonder what the fuel load is, getting airborne with so short a run. Tanker support would have to be buddy stores on other -35B's or other assets.

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4258
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: F-35B

Postby Duncan Edwards » Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:28 pm

kham wrote:Yeah, but the -B is only useful on the Wasp-class, America-class or strips ashore; it has no arrestor hook, so cannot land shipboard in the standard trap configuration. I wonder what the fuel load is, getting airborne with so short a run. Tanker support would have to be buddy stores on other -35B's or other assets.


I understand and I'm not saying it keeps the "B" model from operating on a big deck but a ramp might keep anything else from operating on the smaller one. As for the rest, come back in five years. 8-)
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

User avatar
DangerGirl
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:50 am

Re: F-35B

Postby DangerGirl » Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:51 pm

Am I the only one who finds the sight of a jet fighter taking off with full-down stabilators and what amounts to a deployed speed brake jarring?

User avatar
kham
Always Remembered
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:52 pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ont
Contact:

Re: F-35B

Postby kham » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:13 pm

No, several of the folks over at Lex's said exactly the same thing. Plus , that whole transformers vibe with all those doors and nozzles going is a bit eye opening. Not to kick Lockheed too hard , but they seem to have utterly abandoned the KISS principle.

Not to mention, most great aircraft always seem to follow the old saw "if it looks good, it probably is"
I'm not quite getting that vibe yet from this one. And I hope I'm wrong, since the CAF is buying 80-odd of them

User avatar
Duncan Edwards
Posts: 4258
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:41 am

Re: F-35B

Postby Duncan Edwards » Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:29 am

DangerGirl wrote:Am I the only one who finds the sight of a jet fighter taking off with full-down stabilators and what amounts to a deployed speed brake jarring?


I don't know. Things without rotors or James Bond aren't supposed to go up and down like an elevator to begin with. 8-)
It's a dirty job but I got to do it for 27 years. Thank you.

jimbomite
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:44 am

Re: F-35B

Postby jimbomite » Sat Dec 24, 2011 7:32 pm

It is an awesome airplane - just wait when more information comes out on it.

Enjoy your Christmas.

Jim


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests