I had this issue in the back of my mind for a while.
I just joined Deviant Art and became a member of the “Quicksand Group”.
A recent incident over there firmly impressed upon me the belief that we might have a real problem on our hands.
I was looking at comments on the attached picture by “~QSSuwako”. Dates are relative to the date of this posting in QSF.
*****
~PajamaGirl2014 Apr 26, 2012 – “That's so cute! Poor girl! Goodbye loli I hope you had a good life!”
This comment raised my eyebrows a bit. So I responded with my own post.
~Dark-Angel-Seven 4 days ago New member
“It's been a long standing tradition (15 plus years worth) that fatal scenes involving minors is not allowed.
This may have fallen by the wayside when the community evolved beyond "deepsinking.org" in or about 2007.
I believe that it is a good idea to keep it in place. So no! Loli WILL survive this one!”
*
~PajamaGirl2014 2 days ago – “huh?”
I became a bit alarmed. So I responded.
~Dark-Angel-Seven 1 day ago New member
“I know your comment was minor with no intention of harm. So I speak within that context.
I don't want to sound like a jerk. But this internet community that surrounds the QS interest began in the mid to late 1990's. I joined it in 1997.
There is an established agreement that dates all the way back to he beginning that fatals scenes involving minors (non-adults) are not allowed due to the fetish nature of the bulk of the movement, let alone comon desency.
For the health of the community I am trying to be a voice to keep this going because this would open a can of worms (pedophilia) that we do not want opened in this culture.
I recall a picture drawn as an inside joke several years ago by either Acid Testor or someone of his skill level of a bus load of high school cheer leaders going down in a mud pit. They were all trying to cross the mud to get out but died sinking to horrible deaths as the bus went under.
Now that the "joke" is over, the picture stands alone somewhere on the internet. I can just see some QS pedo'(they do exist) "jacking off" on the picture as he feeds his fantacy.
Again, I am sorry if I sound like a jerk. But I am trying to shore up a dam that was secure until about 2007 or so.
I do not see you as a problem. But I do see an innocent step in the wrong direction.
Sorry.”
Her response blew me away completely!
~PajamaGirl2014 1 day ago
“This is all very silly, I don't even know what QS means.
You seem really devoted to protecting something that most people probably don't even realize exists.
Lots of people draw loli's dying, it's not a big deal they're just pictures. Most people just think it's silly, I never knew people 'jacked off' to it but this is the internet and there people who jack off to everything, but people are not going to make the connection because that's just a random thing.
Applying the rules for your imaginary club to things outside it just seems silly to me is all, nothing about this breaks DA rules and that's all that matters.
I don't know what 1997 was like because I was a baby then, but in 2013 people don't take the internet that seriously.”
*****
First of all, I am refraining from responding to the last comment because it would break the group rule banning verbal slamming of another list member.
Second, I do not want the FBI at my doorstep with a warrant for my arrest for the crime of aggravated assault on a minor since the description given puts PJ2014 in late middle school or high school.
First of all, I need someone with more influence to address this individual because I feel that I have gone as far as I can given the little influence that I have.
Second, I am afraid that this issue is only going to grow worse given the lack of historical and cultural (both ours) that this community posesses.
I hope this clarifies why I am concerned.
<< Drawing of minor (taken from Deviant Art) removed by moderator >>
My stories are my writings. They reflect who and what I am. User beware.